• Welcome to https://albinowners.net, the new home of Albin Owners Group!
• You will need to log in here, and you may want to bookmark this site. If you don't remember your password, use the I forgot my password link to reset it.
• All content has been transferred from our previous site.
• Contact Us if you have any questions or notice a problem. If you're not receiving our email, include a phone number where we can text you.
• You will need to log in here, and you may want to bookmark this site. If you don't remember your password, use the I forgot my password link to reset it.
• All content has been transferred from our previous site.
• Contact Us if you have any questions or notice a problem. If you're not receiving our email, include a phone number where we can text you.
FAQ:
• Membership information
• Burgees
• How to post photos
• Membership information
• Burgees
• How to post photos
Mandatory for marinas to carry low sulfur diesel dyed
Moderator: Jeremyvmd
-
- In Memorium
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:20 am
- Home Port: St Michaels,Md.
- Location: Baltimore
Mandatory for marinas to carry low sulfur diesel dyed
Eff Oct 1, high sulfur should be replaced w/ low sulfur dyed fuel, than in a couple of years ( if not before) it will be Ultra Low . yes it is about 6 cents higher in cost. Some marinas have been carrying this product for a year
- jcollins
- In Memorium
- Posts: 4927
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:05 pm
- Home Port: Baltimore
- Location: Seneca Creek Marina
- Contact:
- Mariner
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: Gig Harbor, WA
If you could, would you mind posting a source for this information? What jurisdiction(s) are affected? What agency is responsible? What law madates it?
I don't like it when information like this is passed along as fact without any supporting documentation. That's how destructive rumors get started. I'm not doubting your honesty or integrity, just looking for more details.
Thanks.
I don't like it when information like this is passed along as fact without any supporting documentation. That's how destructive rumors get started. I'm not doubting your honesty or integrity, just looking for more details.
Thanks.
- DougSea
- Gold Member
- Posts: 2762
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 9:45 am
- Home Port: Safe Harbor - Essex Island Marina, Essex, CT
- Location: Essex, Connecticut
Check out the following link which gives some dates and background on ULSD.
http://www.chevron.com/products/prodser ... d.shtml#A2
http://www.chevron.com/products/prodser ... d.shtml#A2
Doug
Sonny IV
2006 35TE Convertible, Volvo D6-370's
Former owner - Sonny III, 1997 28TE with "The BEAST"
Sonny IV
2006 35TE Convertible, Volvo D6-370's
Former owner - Sonny III, 1997 28TE with "The BEAST"
- jcollins
- In Memorium
- Posts: 4927
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:05 pm
- Home Port: Baltimore
- Location: Seneca Creek Marina
- Contact:
- Pitou
- Gold Member
- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:34 pm
- Home Port: Gloucester, MA
- Location: Essex, MA
- Mariner
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Doug,
Thank you for posting that information. This is what I'm talking about. Assuming that we can trust the folks at Chevron, it looks as though this ULSD has already been implemented in all 50 states and Canada. This would have been done in June of this year for everywhere but California, who did it back in January.
Thank you for posting that information. This is what I'm talking about. Assuming that we can trust the folks at Chevron, it looks as though this ULSD has already been implemented in all 50 states and Canada. This would have been done in June of this year for everywhere but California, who did it back in January.
- Mariner
- Gold Member
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Actually, after closer review, it appears that marine and off-road diesels only have to meet the <500ppm standard and that there is no timeline for them to meet the <15ppm standard outside of California.
Butch, are you saying that you have additional information as to the implementation of a lower standard for off-road diesel fuels?
Butch, are you saying that you have additional information as to the implementation of a lower standard for off-road diesel fuels?
-
- In Memorium
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:20 am
- Home Port: St Michaels,Md.
- Location: Baltimore
The mandate comes from the EPA over the Refining companies. The locomotive and marine industry follows the On Road and off road use of diesel. This is a difficult forum to explain the future of marine use and the applicable jurisdiction throughout the US. As mentioned California and Canada have their own agenda to expedite the use of ULS.
The ULS (15PPM) is to be in use by 2010 and Marine by 2012. Some refiners, terminalling companies, and marketers will begin to sell the ULS now. In the mean time, we on the east coast will be buying LS and not HS as we have been in the past, and we we will start seeing ULS over the next couple of years.
The ULS (15PPM) is to be in use by 2010 and Marine by 2012. Some refiners, terminalling companies, and marketers will begin to sell the ULS now. In the mean time, we on the east coast will be buying LS and not HS as we have been in the past, and we we will start seeing ULS over the next couple of years.
- StockHR
- Gold Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:37 am
- Location: Rock Hall, MD
Got a heads up notice from Cummins telling its customers that when switching between Diesel, low sulpher & ultra low sulpher that the gaskets are effected. For example; the gasket on the lift pump on the Cummins will swell up when you switch from diesel to low sulpher and will actuall shrink when you move to ultra low sulpher possibly causing the gasket to leak. They recommend changing that gasket or others as soon as you notice any leak since it will only get worse.
Mike
MaryGrace
A34
Mike
MaryGrace
A34