Hello all,I am considering a te 28 and I'm looking for some feedback on the disadvantages of the Albin hull design as far as handling is concerned.All hulls are a trade off and their is no perfect hull.Thanks for any feedback.
Brian
• Welcome to https://albinowners.net, the new home of Albin Owners Group!
• You will need to log in here, and you may want to bookmark this site. If you don't remember your password, use the I forgot my password link to reset it.
• All content has been transferred from our previous site.
• Contact Us if you have any questions or notice a problem. If you're not receiving our email, include a phone number where we can text you.
• You will need to log in here, and you may want to bookmark this site. If you don't remember your password, use the I forgot my password link to reset it.
• All content has been transferred from our previous site.
• Contact Us if you have any questions or notice a problem. If you're not receiving our email, include a phone number where we can text you.
FAQ:
• Membership information
• Burgees
• How to post photos
• Membership information
• Burgees
• How to post photos
Hull design disadvantages
-
- Swabby
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:11 am
- Home Port: Pt. Judith,RI
- Cape Codder
- Gold Member
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 8:59 pm
- Location: Falmouth, MA - Cape Cod
Re: Hull design disadvantages
The disadvantages of the 28 hull.
[*]The bow is broad with a bit of "tug" design, allowing great interior space. The disadvantage is that it will cause spray to be thown up and onto the windshield. Being a Pilot House design, it's not uncomfortable, but the boat gets wet easily.
[*]The chine at the bow is sharply angled, and not rounded. The disadvantage I'd that when at rest the is a lot of "slapping" noise and can be irritating when trying to sleep.
[*]Interior deck drainage is somewhat poor. Under hatch covers there are drain tubes that are supposed to drain out the transom through hulls. The drain tubes are notorious for leaking and check valves clogging with debris.
That's all that come to mind.
[*]The bow is broad with a bit of "tug" design, allowing great interior space. The disadvantage is that it will cause spray to be thown up and onto the windshield. Being a Pilot House design, it's not uncomfortable, but the boat gets wet easily.
[*]The chine at the bow is sharply angled, and not rounded. The disadvantage I'd that when at rest the is a lot of "slapping" noise and can be irritating when trying to sleep.
[*]Interior deck drainage is somewhat poor. Under hatch covers there are drain tubes that are supposed to drain out the transom through hulls. The drain tubes are notorious for leaking and check valves clogging with debris.
That's all that come to mind.
Bob
2003 Albin 28 TE
Santosha
2003 Albin 28 TE
Santosha
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:20 am
Re: Hull design disadvantages
I particularly agree with the deck drain comment. Have a made a change or two but no great impact and frankly there is no solution. Also bilge water collects in the bow below the pumps, but can be handled by installing a stripper.
In general the boat handles very well. Much better than the Silverton pilot house. The skeg protects the prop and, unfortunately also restricts the rate of turn at higher speeds. With the thruster they handle better than a twin screw when manuvering.
In general the boat handles very well. Much better than the Silverton pilot house. The skeg protects the prop and, unfortunately also restricts the rate of turn at higher speeds. With the thruster they handle better than a twin screw when manuvering.
Don
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 2115
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:35 am
- Home Port: Mystic, CT
- Location: New Port Richey, FL
Re: Hull design disadvantages
One of these? How would that work?Yearwood wrote: Also bilge water collects in the bow below the pumps, but can be handled by installing a stripper.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post. To view images, please register for a free account.
Formerly
1983 40 Albin trunk cabin
Attitude Adjustment
Mystic, CT
1983 40 Albin trunk cabin
Attitude Adjustment
Mystic, CT
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:20 am
Re: Hull design disadvantages
Not quite, but I am willing to try. Years ago ships used stripping pumps, to remove the last of liquid cargo. They were smaller, had suctions located lower and were very effective at removing small quantities of cargo, ballast water, etc. Some time ago I posted my solution to this problem which has worked flawlessly for the 10 years it has been installed. Still, I would like to try your suggestion.
Don
- jcollins
- In Memorium
- Posts: 4927
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 9:05 pm
- Home Port: Baltimore
- Location: Seneca Creek Marina
- Contact:
Re: Hull design disadvantages
Gypsy Rose Lee? Your giving away your (our) age.One of these? How would that work?
John
Former - 28 TE Convertible"Afterglow"
Former - 28 TE Convertible"Afterglow"
- RobS
- Gold Member
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:20 am
- Home Port: Center Moriches, NY
- Contact:
Re: Hull design disadvantages
Sounds to me like what Jay suggested aboveYearwood wrote:....... They were smaller, had suctions located lower and were very effective at removing small quantities of.......
Rob S.
"TENACIOUS"
1974 Chris Craft 36' Commander Tournament
Cummins 6BTA 330B's
(Former Owner)
"TOY-RIFIC" 2000 28TE, 6LP, Hull 408
Luck is the residue of good design.
"TENACIOUS"
1974 Chris Craft 36' Commander Tournament
Cummins 6BTA 330B's
(Former Owner)
"TOY-RIFIC" 2000 28TE, 6LP, Hull 408
Luck is the residue of good design.
-
- Gold Member
- Posts: 2115
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:35 am
- Home Port: Mystic, CT
- Location: New Port Richey, FL
Re: Hull design disadvantages
Um...I thought we were talking about a "vintage" trawler.jcollins wrote:Gypsy Rose Lee? Your giving away your (our) age.
Formerly
1983 40 Albin trunk cabin
Attitude Adjustment
Mystic, CT
1983 40 Albin trunk cabin
Attitude Adjustment
Mystic, CT