• Welcome to https://albinowners.net, the new home of Albin Owners Group!
• You will need to log in here, and you may want to bookmark this site. If you don't remember your password, use the I forgot my password link to reset it.
• All content has been transferred from our previous site.
Contact Us if you have any questions or notice a problem. If you're not receiving our email, include a phone number where we can text you.

Keel vs no keel

Post Reply
halfmoon
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:53 am
Home Port: EDENTON, NC
Location: YEOPIM RIVER, NW ALBEMARLE SOUND

Keel vs no keel

Post by halfmoon »

Apparently, Albin made a few 28's with I/O drive which did not have a keel. Any I/O owners out there who care to express an opinion? Or better, anyone with experience with both I/O and keeled 28's who can speak from experience regarding both hull forms.
User avatar
RobS
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4044
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:20 am
Home Port: Center Moriches, NY
Contact:

Post by RobS »

I believe the I/O model is under 1% of all 28TE's so not sure how much feedback is available.....
Rob S.
"TENACIOUS"
1974 Chris Craft 36' Commander Tournament
Cummins 6BTA 330B's

(Former Owner)
"TOY-RIFIC" 2000 28TE, 6LP, Hull 408

Luck is the residue of good design.
User avatar
Mariner
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1450
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Gig Harbor, WA

Post by Mariner »

The primary purpose of the keel on an Albin is to protect the shaft, propeller, and rudder. The I/O achieves that without a keel.

The keel also provides stability in rough water, but a skilled operator can use the outdrive to compensate for roll movement.

But most of all, the I/O with no keel would be prefered by someone who wants a shallow draft boat, so the lack of a keel is a tradeoff they're willing to accept.

There are too many variables to predcict what impact it would have on fuel efficiency. You would think it might be better, but then you have to consider that relocating the engine farther aft may affect the trim attitude, so it's really hard to say one way or the other.
User avatar
chiefrcd
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 10:29 am
Home Port: Deltaville, VA
Location: Deltaville Virginia
Contact:

Post by chiefrcd »

I've only seen two of these inboard outboards and in both cases the units appeared to be badly corroded. Both boats were older models. I would be concerned with so much weight being farther back in the boat as the Albin 28 is weight sensitive.
Last edited by chiefrcd on Thu Oct 02, 2008 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Albin 28TE "Southwind"
User avatar
Mariner
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1450
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Gig Harbor, WA

Post by Mariner »

Don't forget that the drive unit can be trimmed up and down, so that may alleviate some of the problem of the weight distribution.
craw_daddy
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:51 pm
Home Port: Key Largo, FL
Location: Key Largo, FL

Post by craw_daddy »

the drive motor tilt won't have an appreciable affect on changing the weight distribution since it is only the outdrive traveling vertically (very little horizontal travel) + the weight of teh thing traveling is negligable when compared to the fixed position of heavier masses (like the engine, fuel tanks, etc..)

The really big deal would be improved 'shoal water' performance by I/O trim..
2006 28te 'Grace Full'
Key Largo, FL
User avatar
Mariner
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 1450
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Gig Harbor, WA

Post by Mariner »

I meant that vectoring the thrust will affect the trim attitude of the boat and could potentially compensate for poor weight distribution.
Post Reply

Return to “Tournament Express 26-35”